| PerfilSquawkBlogFotosBlogListas | Ayuda |
|
19 julio Greg Reyes is not going down without a fightLawyers for former Brocade Communications CEO Greg Reyes are working overtime to prevent their client from being the first casualty of the burgeoning federal investigation into backdating stock options. CNBC has learned that just last Thursday they made a detailed power-point presentation to the US Attorney’s Office in the Northern District of California which laid out key points in their defense, including their contention that Reyes didn't personally benefit from the backdating and their opinion that Reyes is "a good guy." As CNBC was first to report, Reyes is likely to face civil charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission in its investigation of stock-options back dating. The SEC's enforcement division has issued a Wells Notice to Reyes informing him that the staff has recommended to the full commission that he should be charged in the matter. While the full commission may decide not to bring charges, such moves are rare, and even attorneys for Reyes concede that the SEC will likely file a civil case in days or weeks. The big question is whether Reyes, who resigned from Brocade more than a year ago, will be charged criminally by the US Attorney's office. Lawyers and representatives for Reyes say that last week they made a last-ditch attempt to get prosecutors to back off during a lengthy power-point presentation made to the US Attorney in San Francisco. According to people with direct knowledge of the presentation, Reyes' lawyers argued that he had little accounting knowledge - he was predominantly a salesman, and even though he had control over the granting of options, Reyes wasn’t conscious of the fact that he was doing something potentially illegal. Further, his attorneys claimed that Reyes relied on the accounting expertise of the company’s CFO and audit committee to serve as a check in his options granting practices. Reyes’s attorneys pointed to the Board of Directors at Brocade - which was notably advised by legendary Silicon Valley attorney Larry Sonsini - which gave their client wide authority to grant options and provided no guidelines as to how to grant the options. Mr. Sonsini was not available for comment. Though the company was forced to restate its earnings due to faulty accounting of options, his attorneys claimed that “backdating” was only a marginal portion of the restatement. Meanwhile, attorneys for Reyes called their client "a good guy," as well as a "well liked, respected young CEO" who would make a "sympathetic defendant”. They cited his many charitable donations, which included what they described as an anonymous donation of $1 million to a Brocade fund for victims of September 11. In an interview with CNBC, representatives of Reyes said that since the enactment of the Federal Securities Act of 1933, there has never been a prosecution, let alone a conviction of a defendant who did not profit from wrongdoing; financial gain is always the motive in securities fraud cases. Reyes’s attorneys claim that there is no allegation of self-enrichment or self-dealing. Attorneys for Reyes are cautiously optimistic about their chances to stave off an indictment. The US Attorney's office won't comment on the matter, but one thing is certain: CNBC has confirmed that federal officials will bring their first backdating case within a month, and the Reyes case is at the top of their list.
Charles Gasparino - CNBC Comentarios (2)
Los comentarios se han desactivado en esta página.
Vínculos de referenciaWeblogs que hacen referencia a esta entrada
|
|
|